Opinion

Alston v. State

  • 159 Md. App. 253
  • 858 A.2d 1100
  • 859 A.2d 1100
  • 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 157
Court
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Filed
Oct 5, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Davis
On the bench
Davis, Eyler, Sharer
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.6%

Reversed on other grounds by Alston v. State, 433 Md. 275 (2013)

explaining that “standing” refers to the defendant’s “reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises or the property”

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that “standing” refers to the defendant’s “reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises or the property”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DAVIS, Judge,

dissenting.

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Stanley v. State, 157 Md.App. 363 , 851 A.2d 612 (2004), I respectfully dissent to the holding of the Majority as to Issue II.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.