holding that there was no logical basis for an ordinance distinguishing mobile homes manufactured in one complete section from dwellings constructed on site or manufactured in two or more sections
How later courts described this case
- holding that there was no logical basis for an ordinance distinguishing mobile homes manufactured in one complete section from dwellings constructed on site or manufactured in two or more sections
- zoning ordinance which allowed mobile homes on individual lots only for related person to provide care for disabled relative was "token exception" to total prohibition against mobile homes on individual lots and thus impermissible
- drawing the same distinction in an exclusionary zoning case
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HUTCHINSON, Justice,
concurring.
I join the majority opinion. That opinion implicitly recognizes the important distinction in exclusionary zoning cases, between equal protection which is applicable when people are being excluded and substantive due process which is applicable when, as in the instant case, the rights of landowners are being affected.