Opinion

In Re Appeal of M.A. Kravitz Co.

501 Pa. 200
460 A.2d 1075
1983 Pa. LEXIS 525

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Apr 25, 1983
Status: Published
Author: Nix
On the bench: Zappala, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson
Cited by: 24 cases
Authority: More cited than 10.4%

The opinion

NIX, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent. I would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court for the reasons set forth in its well analyzed opinion. See In Re: Appeal of M.A. Kravitz Co., Inc., 53 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 622 , 419 A.2d 227 (1980). The relaxed judicial review of suburban zoning decisions reflected in the plurality’s view permits virtually unlimited freedom to developing municipalities to erect exclusionary walls on their boundaries, according to local whim, and to use the zoning power for aims far beyond its legitimate purposes.

LARSEN, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.