The opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
Weight, P. J.:
I would affirm the judgment of sentence. Although a few questions on cross-examination may have been technically improper, 1 no objection was made at the time and the record clearly indicates that the matter was not sufficiently prejudicial to require the grant of a new trial. Cf. Commonwealth v. Comer, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 537 , 76 A. 2d 233 .
Watkins and Hannum, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.
Our Supreme Court has now ruled in Commonwealth v. Smith, 432 Pa. 517 , 248 A. 2d 24 , filed November 27, 1968, that it is proper to question a defendant, who places his character in issue, concerning prior arrests which did not result in convictions.