Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thorne

  • 223 Pa. Super. 122
  • 299 A.2d 370
  • 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1065
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 11, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Hoffman
On the bench
Wright, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, Packel, Packer
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.3%

The opinion

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The Commonwealth, appellant in this case, conceded in oral argument before this court that the inad *124 missibility of the suppressed evidence would not substantially handicap the prosecution of this case. An examination of the suppression hearing record indicates that this is true. In light of Commonwealth v. Bosurgi, 411 Pa. 56, 63 , 190 A. 2d 304 (1963) and Commonwealth v. Pomponi, 436 Pa. 565, 568 , 259 A. 2d 872 (1970), such an admission requires that this appeal be quashed without determining the validity of the search.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.