Opinion

Commonwealth v. Coleman

  • 280 Pa. Super. 162
  • 421 A.2d 455
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3037
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 29, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Wickersham
On the bench
Wickersham, Brosky, Eagen
Cited by
4 cases

Commonwealth not entitled to extension where it could have listed case for trial during last six days of Rule 1100 period

How later courts described this case

  • Commonwealth not entitled to extension where it could have listed case for trial during last six days of Rule 1100 period

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WICKERSHAM, Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent.

I would affirm the judgment of sentence on the opinion of the learned trial judge, the Honorable John E. Backenstoe.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.