Opinion

In the Matter of Gordon

  • 385 Mass. 48
  • 429 N.E.2d 1150
  • 1982 Mass. LEXIS 1229
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Jan 13, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Nolan
On the bench
Hennessey, Wilkins, Liacos, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch
Cited by
18 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.5%

denying second petition for reinstatement, after sixteen years of disbarment, of former judge con- victed of larceny and conspiracy in highly publicized cases involving corruption related to public funds

How later courts described this case

  • denying second petition for reinstatement, after sixteen years of disbarment, of former judge con- victed of larceny and conspiracy in highly publicized cases involving corruption related to public funds
  • reinstatement of petitioner sixteen years after disbarment for larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny would be detrimental to integrity of the bar despite recommendation of Board of Bar Overseers to readmit
  • while the board's recommendation as to sanction is entitled to substantial deference, "ultimate duty of decision rests with this court"
  • judge who was convicted of bribery and larceny not reinstated even after 17 years of disbarment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Nolan, J.

(dissenting). In 1975, this court unanimously granted the petition for reinstatement of an unrepentant but convicted perjurer in spite of an adverse recommendation by the Board of Bar Overseers. Matter of Hiss, 368 Mass. 447 (1975). In this case, the Board of Bar Overseers recommends the reinstatement of Gordon, but the court denies his petition.

In trying to gouge the impact of Gordon’s readmission to the bar on the public, the court reminds us of the scandal of the Boston Common Garage cases and describes them as “a notorious saga of corruption and theft.” However, by comparison with the national notoriety of the Hiss trial (see United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822 [2d Cir. 1950], cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 [1951]), Gordon’s prosecution was only a local media attraction. Gordon’s conduct for which he was convicted was reprehensible and all the more so because he was a judge at the time, but, to his credit, he does not remain obdurate and unregenerate while protesting his innocence. I find it most difficult to understand the reason for the difference in treatment between Hiss and Gordon.

I would allow Gordon’s petition for reinstatement on condition that he pass the Massachusetts bar examination.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.