agreeing that "[r]einstatement prior to the elapse of parole would not comport with the principle that a parolee is not to be accorded complete liberty and privilege prior to successful completion of parole"
How later courts described this case
- agreeing that "[r]einstatement prior to the elapse of parole would not comport with the principle that a parolee is not to be accorded complete liberty and privilege prior to successful completion of parole"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
DeMASCIO, District Judge,
concurring.
I concur in Judge Rosen’s Opinion and Order.