stating that where all of the required information was contained in or attached to the petition, the court would not elevate form' over substance
How later courts described this case
- stating that where all of the required information was contained in or attached to the petition, the court would not elevate form' over substance
- addressing termination of maintenance provision in dissolution decree requiring former wife to notify former husband in the event that she remarry or "cohabitate with a male"
- declining to follow Burke and holding instead that an Indiana URESA support order cannot modify a foreign state’s support order
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BARTEAU, Judge,
concurring in result.
While I still believe, as I expressed in Burke v. Burke (1993), Ind.App., 617 N.E.2d 959 , that the intent in enacting the registration provision was to provide an additional remedy, and that modification by the registering court was contemplated, the majority of courts addressing this issue have held to the contrary and I will yield to their wisdom.
STATON, J., concurs.