Opinion

Sievers v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW

520 Pa. 83
551 A.2d 1057
1989 Pa. LEXIS 1

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Jan 6, 1989
Status: Published
On the bench: Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Stout, Zappala
Cited by: 8 cases
Authority: More cited than 82.1%

where employer’s testimony is crucial, such testimony should be compelled

How later courts described this case

where employer’s testimony is crucial, such testimony should be compelled

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

ORDER AFFIRMED.

PAPADAKOS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which LARSEN and STOUT, JJ., joined:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.