Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ritchie

  • 509 Pa. 357
  • 502 A.2d 148
  • 1985 Pa. LEXIS 449
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 11, 1985
Status
Published
Author
Hutchinson
On the bench
Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
Cited by
38 cases

Reversed on other grounds by Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987)

defendant’s rights under 6th Amendment to U.S. Constitution outweigh the confidentiality provisions of the CPSL

How later courts described this case

  • defendant’s rights under 6th Amendment to U.S. Constitution outweigh the confidentiality provisions of the CPSL

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HUTCHINSON, Justice,

dissenting.

I join the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Larsen. However, on remand I would instruct the lower court to consider the application of the unqualified statutory privilege of sexual assault counselors for victim’s communications to them, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5945.1, to these facts, as affected by appellee’s right of confrontation under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.