Opinion

Commonwealth v. Littlejohn

  • 433 Pa. 336
  • 250 A.2d 811
  • 1969 Pa. LEXIS 573
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jan 24, 1969
Status
Published
Author
Bell
On the bench
Roberts, Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Beien, Bobeets, Eagkn
Cited by
52 cases

imposition of life imprisonment precludes the imposition of the death penalty in a retrial

How later courts described this case

  • imposition of life imprisonment precludes the imposition of the death penalty in a retrial

Written by the judges who cited it.

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Commonwealth v. Jackson, 443 Pa. 553 (1971)

    The post-conviction hearing judge believed that Littlejohn was inapplicable because the fear of the death penalty was not the sole reason for not filing an appeal.
    Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaJul 15, 1971Read it

The opinion

*352 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell:

I concur in the Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Littlejohn. I dissent from the Court’s decision and Opinion in Commonwealth v. Archambault, which completely changes the very long and well established law of Pennsylvania. Furthermore, if Justice Roberts is right, then every defendant who obtains a new trial after a conviction of any and every crime cannot, on re-conviction at his new trial, receive a higher or greater sentence than was imposed at his first trial; and this would be so even if the evidence at re-trial was different from and stronger than the evidence at his first trial and warranted a more severe sentence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.