Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

  • 443 Pa. 553
  • 279 A.2d 163
  • 1971 Pa. LEXIS 948
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 15, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Brien
On the bench
Barbieri, Bele, Bell, Brien, Eagen, Jones, Pomeroy, Roberts
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.2%

The opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

On February 27,1958, a jury found appellant guilty of murder in the first degree. Motions for a new trial and arrest of judgment were filed March 3, 1958, but they were later withdrawn on June 26, 1958, and no appeal was taken. Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment on June 26, 1958. A petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed by appellant on October 8, 1964, and was dismissed by opinion and order of Judge Ellenbogen on September 2, 1965. On May 26, 1969,. appellant filed a petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. After a hearing, this petition was dismissed by order and opinion dated September 9, 1970. It is the dismissal of that petition which is the subject of this appeal.

Although appellant raised several allegations in his post-conviction petition, his appeal from the dismissal of that petition concerns only one allegation. He claims that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right of appeal. The post-conviction hearing judge found that appellant did not appeal his conviction and sentence because: “(1) he wished to avoid the hazard of a death sentence if a new trial were granted and (2) his lawyer found no merit in an appeal and thought an appeal would be fruitless.”

We held in Commonwealth v. Littlejohn, 433 Pa. 336 , 250 A. 2d 811 (1969), at 349, that: “A decision not to appeal because of [fear of the death penalty] *555 cannot, as a matter of law, be a knowing and voluntary waiver of the right to appeal.”

The post-conviction hearing judge believed that Littlejohn was inapplicable because the fear of the death penalty was not the sole reason for not filing an appeal.

We do not agree. Appellant’s trial attorney testified at the post-conviction hearing that the main consideration in not appealing was that he might receive the death penalty. Under such circumstances, he cannot be held to have waived his right of appeal voluntarily.

Order reversed and case remanded with directions that appellant be permitted to file post-trial motions as though timely filed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.