Opinion

Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Franklin & Lindsey, Inc.

  • 497 Pa. 2
  • 438 A.2d 590
  • 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1107
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 17, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Flaherty
On the bench
O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Kauffman, Wilkinson
Cited by
10 cases

Draftsperson laid off but recalled to do purely secretarial work at no pay reduction. Recall properly refused because job was not in keeping with education and experience

How later courts described this case

  • Draftsperson laid off but recalled to do purely secretarial work at no pay reduction. Recall properly refused because job was not in keeping with education and experience

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

FLAHERTY, Justice,

dissenting.

I must dissent. Under the facts of this case, the claimant was clearly offered “suitable work”, as that term is defined by the Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) No. 2897, art. 1, § 4 as amended, 43 P.S. § 753(t).

KAUFFMAN, J., joins this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.