holding 10 that this “Court may affirm the trial court for any reason so long as the basis of [the] decision is clear.”
How later courts described this case
- holding 10 that this “Court may affirm the trial court for any reason so long as the basis of [the] decision is clear.”
- recognizing the breadth of the ethics-based duty of confidentiality in Pa. R.P.C. 1.6
- Saylor, J. dissenting from dismissal of appeal as improvidently granted, joined by Castille, C.J.
- “As to the availability of in camera review, I agree with the many jurisdictions that have had little difficulty recognizing the availability of such a procedure in the discovery and public disclosure arenas.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*549
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2009, the appeal is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement in which Chief Justice CASTILLE joins.