distinguishing § 101.060(a)(3), which specifies that the governmental entity receive "actual notice" to be liable for the "removal or destruction of a traffic or road sign, signal, or warning device by a third person," from § 101.060(a)(2), which requires "notice" but not "actual notice"
How later courts described this case
- distinguishing § 101.060(a)(3), which specifies that the governmental entity receive "actual notice" to be liable for the "removal or destruction of a traffic or road sign, signal, or warning device by a third person," from § 101.060(a)(2), which requires "notice" but not "actual notice"
- assuming the same in context of analyzing whether Subsection (a)(2)'s "notice" included constructive notice
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice,
concurring.
I concur in the judgment only. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.5 (concurring and dissenting opinions).