Opinion

Weiner v. Dial

  • 653 S.W.2d 786
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1102
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 29, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Clinton
On the bench
Campbell, Onion, Teague, Clinton, McCormick, Miller
Cited by
24 cases

appointment and compensation of attorneys to represent criminal clients pursuant to art. 26.05 is a criminal law matter

How later courts described this case

  • appointment and compensation of attorneys to represent criminal clients pursuant to art. 26.05 is a criminal law matter
  • appointment and compensation of attorneys to represent criminal clients pursuant was a criminal law matter

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CLINTON, Judge,

dissenting.

The majority reads the statutory language in Articles 26.04 and 26.05, § 1, V.A. C.C.P., too literally. An appointed counsel, like a retained attorney, is charged with handling such “ancillary matters” that are in the interest of, and may redound to the benefit of, his client. Inhibiting full, robust and conscientious representation of the indigent appellant, as well as the indigent accused, ill serves the legal profession and the criminal justice system.

I dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.