noting that “when a defendant seeks to introduce exculpatory evidence based on an alternative perpetrator theory, the court must still evaluate this evidence under the ordinary evidentiary rules as it would any other exculpatory evidence”
How later courts described this case
- noting that “when a defendant seeks to introduce exculpatory evidence based on an alternative perpetrator theory, the court must still evaluate this evidence under the ordinary evidentiary rules as it would any other exculpatory evidence”
- stating that a collection of information can provide probable cause, even if each individual fact does not
- rejecting a similarly broad definition of the term “victims,” noting that such a broad definition would lead to “absurd” results
- concerning whether the sister of a murder victim was entitled to restitution
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PAGE, J.
(concurring in part).
I join in part the concurrence of Justice Sam Hanson.