Opinion

Burton v. State

  • 214 Tenn. 9
  • 18 McCanless 9
  • 377 S.W.2d 900
  • 1964 Tenn. LEXIS 441
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 5, 1964
Status
Published
On the bench
Holmes
Cited by
19 cases

refusing to dismiss an indictment that was based on evidence that had been suppressed under the Fourth Amendment

How later courts described this case

  • refusing to dismiss an indictment that was based on evidence that had been suppressed under the Fourth Amendment
  • refusing to dismiss an indictment that was based upon inadmissible hearsay

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion on Petition to Behear

Counsel for the defendant have filed a petition to rehear in which no new argument is made, no new authority adduced and no material fact is pointed out as overlooked. We have fully considered all of the contentions of the *23 defendant which, are restated in the petition to rehear and have found them without merit. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 32 of Rules of this Court, 209 Tenn. 806 , the petition to rehear is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.