Opinion

Hedicke v. State

  • 779 S.W.2d 837
  • 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 141
  • 1989 WL 65807
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 21, 1989
Status
Published
Author
Teague
On the bench
White, Teague, McCormick, Miller, Campbell, Duncan
Cited by
65 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.2%

stating that personal opinion testimony of a witness who knows the person is one method of proving character

How later courts described this case

  • stating that personal opinion testimony of a witness who knows the person is one method of proving character
  • Legislative use of terms reputation and character, joined by conjunction and evidences intent to abrogate old rule that reputation was the only approved method of proving character
  • “As to the remaining five witnesses, who were not included in the bill of exception, we do not know what their excluded testimony would have been or even if they 16 were prevented from testifying to anything, and we will not speculate as to such.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TEAGUE, J.,

dissents. See the dissenting opinion Judge Teague filed in Avan King v. State of Texas, 773 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). Also see Judge Teague’s concurring opinion in Gary Lynn Murphy v. State of Texas, 777 S.W.2d 44 (Tex.Cr.App.1989).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.