Opinion

Ross v. Robb

  • 651 S.W.2d 680
  • 11 Educ. L. Rep. 1100
  • 1983 Mo. App. LEXIS 3294
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
May 10, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Somerville
On the bench
Clark, Dixon, Kennedy, Manford, Pritchard, Shan-Gler, Somerville
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

SOMERVILLE, Chief Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part in the opinion of Dixon, J., to-wit, I *686 concur that the constitutionality of § 168.-114, RSMo 1978 was adequately raised but dissent as to that part which construes § 536.140, RSMo 1978 as limiting circuit and appellate court review of administrative decisions to matters raised in the petition for review. Such a construction is inconsistent with the clear, plain language of the statute.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.