Opinion

State v. Carter

  • 714 S.W.2d 241
  • 1986 Tenn. LEXIS 833
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 9, 1986
Status
Published
On the bench
Brock, Cooper, Fones, Franks, Harbison
Cited by
112 cases

determining that a juror‟s affidavit supporting the defendant‟s claim that his constitutional right to remain silent had not been honored by the jury was inadmissible under Rule 606(b)

How later courts described this case

  • determining that a juror‟s affidavit supporting the defendant‟s claim that his constitutional right to remain silent had not been honored by the jury was inadmissible under Rule 606(b)
  • after abducting his victim, shooting him to death, rolling his body over a cliff, and stealing his truck, defendant was sentenced to death based on the aggravating circumstances that he committed the murder to avoid arrest and prosecution and committed the murder while committing larceny and kidnapping
  • after abducting his victim, shooting him to death, and stealing his truck, defendant was sentenced to death based on the aggravating circumstances that he committed the murder to avoid arrest and prosecution and committed the murder while committing larceny and kidnapping
  • irrelevant evidence that Defendant changed the vehicle identification number on automobile was clearly harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

PER CURIAM.

A petition to rehear has been filed on behalf of defendant Carter, considered by the Court, found to be without merit, and is respectfully denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.