Opinion

Gonzales v. State

  • 666 S.W.2d 496
  • 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 4574
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
May 19, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Draughn, Ellis
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.1%

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing and Supplement, directs our attention to the recent opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Texas v. Brown, — U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). The “plain view” doctrine is now modified to the extent that it is unnecessary for it to be “immediately apparent” to the police officer that the substance in plain view is contraband. The first requirement of the doctrine, however, remains intact: the officer must still be lawfully in the position from which he views the item seized. Id. at 1541 . Accordingly, our original judgment remains unchanged. The officer here was only in position to view the substance seized because he was carrying out an illegal arrest of the appellant. The “plain view” doctrine, even as modified, provides no justification for this seizure.

The Motion for Rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.