Opinion

Green v. State

  • 494 S.W.2d 356
  • 1973 Mo. LEXIS 1024
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Apr 11, 1973
Status
Published
Author
Seiler
On the bench
Holman, Finch, Donnelly, Mor-Can, Bardgett, Henley, Seiler
Cited by
39 cases

stating that “[h]abeas corpus would appear to be the proper remedy” for a prisoner seeking to have his probation reinstated

How later courts described this case

  • stating that “[h]abeas corpus would appear to be the proper remedy” for a prisoner seeking to have his probation reinstated
  • applying predecessor Rule 27.26
  • habeas corpus is the proper remedy for challenging the revocation of parole or probation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SEILER, Judge

(dissenting).

I would treat defendant’s motion as an application for habeas corpus, set it for reargument, and request counsel to brief and argue the constitutionality of Sec. 549.101, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. We will have to face this issue sooner or later and I believe it is better for all concerned to do so now, rather than postponing it. I therefore respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.