Opinion

Loudres v. State

  • 614 S.W.2d 407
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1344
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Sep 10, 1980
Status
Published
Author
McCORMICK
On the bench
Clinton, Roberts, Teague, McCormick, Dally
Cited by
15 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.1%

noting that motive is not an element of a crime

How later courts described this case

  • noting that motive is not an element of a crime
  • On Motion for Rehearing overruled without written opinion on April 29, 1981, McCormick, J. dissent joined by Dally, J.
  • On Motion for Rehearing overruled without written opinion on 4/29/81, McCormick, J. dissent joined by Dally, J.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DISSENTING OPINION TO DENIAL OF STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION

McCORMICK, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (1981), I dissent to the action of the majority in reversing and remanding a judgment of guilt that is admittedly free of error. Pursuant to the motion filed by the State, the judgment in this cause should be reformed to reflect a punishment of life imprisonment.

DALLY, J., joins.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.