Opinion

Loudres v. State

  • 614 S.W.2d 407
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1344
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Sep 10, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Teague
On the bench
Clinton, Roberts, Teague, McCormick, Dally
Cited by
15 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.1%

noting that motive is not an element of a crime

How later courts described this case

  • noting that motive is not an element of a crime
  • On Motion for Rehearing overruled without written opinion on April 29, 1981, McCormick, J. dissent joined by Dally, J.
  • On Motion for Rehearing overruled without written opinion on 4/29/81, McCormick, J. dissent joined by Dally, J.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION TO OVERRULING STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION

TEAGUE, Judge.

I concur in the majority’s action for the reasons set forth in my Concurring Opinion to Overruling State’s Motion for Rehearing Without Written Opinion in Pierson v. State, 614 S.W.2d 102 (1981).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.