Opinion

Kohler v. Ford Motor Company

  • 187 Neb. 428
  • 191 N.W.2d 601
  • 1971 Neb. LEXIS 642
Court
Nebraska Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 12, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Newton
On the bench
White, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton, Clinton, JJ'
Cited by
45 cases

“[T]he Nebraska Supreme Court has adopted in substance section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.”

How later courts described this case

  • “[T]he Nebraska Supreme Court has adopted in substance section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts.”
  • “[T]he Nebraska Supreme Court has adopted in substance section 402A of the Restatement (Second
  • requiring a strict liability plaintiff to show he was "rightfully using that product”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Newton, J.,

dissenting.

The evidence shows that the automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger was being operated at a speed of 50' to 55 miles per hour. It is not contended that the brakes were defective, yet the vehicle traveled over 385 feet from the time it first left the paved portion of the highway until it upset. It could readily have been stopped within that distance. Even if we accept all of plaintiff’s contentions, it is apparent that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the failure of the driver to apply the brakes and stop.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.