Opinion

Royster v. McGinnis

  • 332 F. Supp. 973
  • 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11938
Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Aug 23, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Hays
On the bench
Hays, Metzner, Lasker
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.7%

Reversed on other grounds by McGinnis v. Royster, 410 U.S. 263 (1973)

The opinion

HAYS, Circuit Judge

(dissenting):

If a classification made by a state has some reasonable basis it does not violate the equal protection clause. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 , 90 S.Ct. 1153 , 25 L.Ed.2d 497 (1970).

There seems to me to be a reasonable ground for distinguishing in the award of good time credit between time spent in state prison under the supervision of the state prison authorities and time spent in county jail under the supervision of local authorities. It was surely not wholly arbitrary for the legislature to provide that the Parole Board should have the power to act upon a prisoner’s application only after the prisoner has spent a fixed proportion of his sentence in a place where his conduct has been under the observation of state prison officials rather than in a local jail.

Under the guise of applying constitutional principles federal judges are increasingly taking over from the states the administration of state prison systems. In this case, as in a number of others recently decided, the assumption of these new duties appears to be based rather on the judges’ conviction that they can administer state prisons more wisely than can the state authorities, and not on any compelling constitutional considerations.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.