Opinion

Winkles v. State

  • 634 S.W.2d 289
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 932
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Apr 7, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Odom
On the bench
Roberts, Odom, Clinton, Teague
Cited by
43 cases

dissenting opinion adopted on motion for rehearing

How later courts described this case

  • dissenting opinion adopted on motion for rehearing
  • for purposes of probable cause determination, affiant’s statement is “credible” when it is “reliable” and “dependable”
  • Opinion on State’s Motion for Rehearing
  • on State’s motion for rehearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

ODOM, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion on original submission, we hold that the affidavit was sufficient to support issuance of the search warrant. 1 Therefore, we grant the State’s motion for rehearing and affirm the judgment.

. Appellant suggests in a second ground of error that the evidence is insufficient when the fruits of the search are excluded from consideration. His premise having been overruled, the conclusion is likewise without merit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.