describing test for determining whether witness should be deemed an accomplice as “whether or not there is sufficient evidence in the record to support Zamora - 11 a charge against” him
How later courts described this case
- describing test for determining whether witness should be deemed an accomplice as “whether or not there is sufficient evidence in the record to support Zamora - 11 a charge against” him
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
McDonald, judge.
Appellant strenuously re-urges his contentions presented on original submission and insists that the court erred in its affirmance.
We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of his motion for rehearing and remain convinced that no error is shown.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.