Opinion

Borden v. Hall

  • 255 S.W.2d 920
  • 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1909
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Sep 27, 1951
Status
Published
On the bench
Walker
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.5%

As “instrument[s] of correction,” correction deeds should not be construed to “alter the nature and legal effect” of the original conveyance.

How later courts described this case

  • As “instrument[s] of correction,” correction deeds should not be construed to “alter the nature and legal effect” of the original conveyance.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Second Motion for Rehearing.

Defendant’s second motion for rehearing has been considered and is overruled. Concerning the construction of Article 5541, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. see: Sovereign Camp Woodmen v. Ruedrich, Tex.Civ.App., 158 S.W. 170 ; Thetford v. Modern Woodmen, Tex.Civ.App., 273 S.W. 666 ; Wells v. Margraves, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 881 ; Heralds of Liberty v. Fern, Tex.Com.App., 296 S.W. 498 , and Goodson v. Goldsmith, 131 Tex. 418 , 115 S.W.2d 1100 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.