Opinion

Ex Parte Rosier

  • 133 F.2d 316
  • 76 U.S. App. D.C. 214
  • 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2502
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Sep 2, 1942
Status
Published
Author
Vinson
On the bench
Stephens, Vinson, Rutledge
Cited by
20 cases

issue not affected by Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 148 F.2d 857 (1945)

How later courts described this case

  • issue not affected by Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 148 F.2d 857 (1945)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

VINSON, Associate Justice

(concurring).

I concur in the result, and add a short statement of my views on this case.

The petition for the writ was filed, if substance rather than form be considered.

The petition stated facts which, if true, entitled appellant to be discharged from custody.

The writ should have issued or, in the alternative, a rule to show cause.

The appellant, represented by competent counsel, was entitled to a hearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.