Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

  • 482 Pa. 130
  • 393 A.2d 414
  • 1978 Pa. LEXIS 957
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 5, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Nix
On the bench
Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Larsen, Manderino
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.5%

motive for prior killing identical with that for instant killing

How later courts described this case

  • motive for prior killing identical with that for instant killing
  • evidence of prior crime admissible to show motive

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NIX, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the majority of this Court in the instant appeal. I adhere to the position I expressed in Commonwealth v. Stasko, 471 Pa. 373, 387-89 , 370 A.2d 350, 357-58 (1977) (Nix, J., concurring), regarding the use of preliminary hearing testimony.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.