Opinion

Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. Commonwealth

  • 535 Pa. 298
  • 635 A.2d 116
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 300
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 10, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Papadakos
On the bench
Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, Montemuro, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Cited by
33 cases

recognizing the agency’s expertise and giving its interpretation “great weight”

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing the agency’s expertise and giving its interpretation “great weight”
  • mean-ing of a statute is a question of law

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PAPADAKOS, Justice,

dissenting.

Since I believe this to be a case of double taxation as argued by the Appellee-taxpayer, I dissent and would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.