Opinion

Commonwealth v. Piper

  • 221 Pa. Super. 187
  • 289 A.2d 193
  • 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1500
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 24, 1972
Status
Published
On the bench
Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.8%

dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., joined by SPAULDING, J.

How later courts described this case

  • dissenting opinion of HOFFMAN, J., joined by SPAULDING, J.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed, and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as she may be there called, and that she be by that court committed until she has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.