Opinion

Smith v. State

  • 152 S.W.3d 275
  • 2005 Mo. LEXIS 2
  • 2005 WL 44386
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Jan 11, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Price
On the bench
Limbaugh, Wolff, Stith, Russell, White, Teitelman, Price
Cited by
25 cases

St. Louis Police Board is an agency of the State of Missouri

How later courts described this case

  • St. Louis Police Board is an agency of the State of Missouri

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge,

concurring.

I agree with the statutory construction set out in the majority opinion. There can be no serious doubt that the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners is an agency of the State of Missouri. As such, the *281 literal interpretation of the State Legal Expense Fund (SLEF), as established in section 105.711 et seq., RSMo 2000, provides coverage. Nonetheless, section 105.711 is somewhat at odds with the spirit of chapter 84, particularly section 84.210, RSMo 2000, which requires the City of St. Louis to pay the expenses of the Board of Police Commissioners and the St. Louis Police Department.

This Court cannot rule on the basis of speculation, especially in the face of the literal language of a statute. Should the general assembly find the result of this case undesirable, it might simply except either the St. Louis Police Department or the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, or both, from coverage by the SLEF and provide that this expense should be paid by the City of St. Louis. Alternatively, of course, should the general assembly find that the result of this case is precisely what it intended, no further action would be necessary.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.