Opinion

Tucker Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartje

  • 278 Ark. 320
  • 650 S.W.2d 559
  • 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1256
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Feb 7, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Hickman
On the bench
Holt, Hickman
Cited by
13 cases

granting the writ for improper venue

How later courts described this case

  • granting the writ for improper venue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice, concurring. I agree with the result but concur to point out that in my opinion the facts in this case, reflected by this record, seem tailor-made for ARCP, Rule 41. While prohibition is not a remedy available to the appellants, ARCP, Rule 41, would appear to be a defense.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.