"[T]here is no compulsory duty resting on a trial court requiring it to stay a proceeding pending before it on account of the pendency in another jurisdiction of an action previously instituted by or between the same parties and on the same cause of action"
How later courts described this case
- "[T]here is no compulsory duty resting on a trial court requiring it to stay a proceeding pending before it on account of the pendency in another jurisdiction of an action previously instituted by or between the same parties and on the same cause of action"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Schettino in the court below.