Opinion

Waller, Lansden, Dortch, & Davis v. Haney

  • 851 S.W.2d 131
  • 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 301
  • 1992 Tenn. LEXIS 656
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 23, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
O'Brien, Reid, Daughtrey, Anderson, Drowota
Cited by
9 cases

the retainer agreement provided that the firm be paid a reasonable fee based on the amount involved, the time expended, the novelty of the transaction, and the deadlines imposed upon co unsel

How later courts described this case

  • the retainer agreement provided that the firm be paid a reasonable fee based on the amount involved, the time expended, the novelty of the transaction, and the deadlines imposed upon co unsel

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

Defendant/Appellee, Franklin L. Haney, has filed a respectful petition to rehear in this cause, asserting that the Court’s opinion incorrectly states material facts established by the evidence and overlooks or misapprehends a material fact.

This Court found that the issue involved was a question of law and not a dispute of material fact. This issue was properly adjudicated by the Chancery Court.

The petition to rehear is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.