Opinion

Thompson v. Connick

  • 578 F.3d 293
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17728
  • 2009 WL 2424566
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Aug 10, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Jones, King, Jolly, Davis, Smith, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Benavides, Stewart, Clement, Prado, Owen, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes
Cited by
23 cases
Authority
More cited than 95.4%

Reversed by Connick v. Thompson, 179 L. Ed. 2d 417 (2011)

holding that it is proper to dismiss allegations against government officers in their official capacities when the allegations duplicate claims against the governmental entity itself

How later courts described this case

  • holding that it is proper to dismiss allegations against government officers in their official capacities when the allegations duplicate claims against the governmental entity itself
  • noting that, because "there is no majority opinion, ... no opinion today will bind any court or future party in this circuit”
  • affirming district court by 8-8 vote
  • affirming by equally divided court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

By reason of an equally divided en banc court, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. The panel opinion was vacated by the grant of rehearing en banc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.