Opinion

Pacific Power & Light v. Jacobson

  • 121 Or. App. 260
  • 854 P.2d 999
  • 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1027
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Jun 23, 1993
Status
Published
Author
De MUNIZ
On the bench
Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, De Muniz
Cited by
8 cases

traveling employee rule is not limited to employees who travel overnight

How later courts described this case

  • traveling employee rule is not limited to employees who travel overnight
  • local travel by lineman

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

De MUNIZ, J.,

concurring in part; dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority that reconsideration should be allowed and that the footnote in our original opinion regarding the overnight qualification was not necessary to our decision.

I dissent from the majority’s holding on reconsideration that claimant’s injury was compensable. Our original opinion holding otherwise was correct, for the reasons stated in that opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.