Opinion

Seguin v. Maloney-Chambers Lumber Co.

  • 198 Or. 272
  • 256 P.2d 514
  • 253 P.2d 252
  • 35 A.L.R. 2d 1412
  • 1953 Ore. LEXIS 169
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 4, 1953
Status
Published
Author
Perry
On the bench
Latottrette, Warner, Lusk, Brand, Perry, Latourette
Cited by
34 cases

describing the doctrine of equitable estoppel in manner consistent with that approach

How later courts described this case

  • describing the doctrine of equitable estoppel in manner consistent with that approach
  • purchaser takes subject to prior rights of which purchaser has actual notice

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Petition for Rehearing

Before Latourette, Chief Justice, and Warner, Lusk, Brand and Perry, Justices.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiffs have petitioned for a rehearing in this matter, which petition is denied. However, since *289 the petitioners seem to feel some uncertainty as to the decree to be entered in the circuit court, we will make this additional statement.

The defendants established no interest in or to the 40 acres in the northeast quarter of section 16, township 13, contained in the description in the original opinion; and a decree should be entered quieting plaintiffs ’ title thereto.

The money judgment to be entered, if any, on behalf of the plaintiffs and against the defendants, after deducting from the $5,000 the value of the timber removed by the plaintiffs plus the value of the 144 acres of land upon which the timber in question is growing, shall be a lien upon the standing timber upon the said 144 acres.

Petition denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.