Opinion

Roberts v. TITAN INS. CO.(ON RECON.)

  • 282 Mich. App. 339
  • 764 N.W.2d 304
Court
Michigan Court of Appeals
Filed
Feb 5, 2009
Status
Published
Author
Hoekstra
On the bench
Fer, Hoekstra, Whitbeck, Talbot
Cited by
19 cases

Overruled in part, on other grounds by Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of Michigan, 492 Mich. 503 (2012)

“When presented with a contractual dispute, a court must read the contract as a whole with a view to ascertaining the intention of the parties, determining what the parties’ agreement is, and enforcing it.”

How later courts described this case

  • “When presented with a contractual dispute, a court must read the contract as a whole with a view to ascertaining the intention of the parties, determining what the parties’ agreement is, and enforcing it.”
  • “It is a cardinal principle of construction that a contract is to be construed as a whole.... ”

Written by the judges who cited it.

Later courts went against this

  • Overruled in part, on other grounds by Spectrum Health Hospitals v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins Co of Michigan, 492 Mich. 503 (2012)

    764 NW2d 304 (2009), overruled on other grounds by Spectrum Health Hospitals v Farm Bureau Mut Ins Co of Michigan, 492 Mich 503
    Michigan Supreme CourtJul 31, 20123 citing opinionsother groundsin partRead it

The opinion

*363 HOEKSTRA, EJ.

(concurring). I concur in the result only.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.