Opinion

Crego v. Coleman

  • 232 Mich. App. 284
  • 591 N.W.2d 277
Court
Michigan Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 15, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Fitzgerald
On the bench
Hoekstra, Sawyer, McDonald, Murphy, Neff, Fitzgerald, Whitbeck
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

Fitzgerald, J.

(concurring). I agree wholeheartedly with the majority’s analysis and resolution. I write separately, however, in light of my dissenting colleague’s sentiment that the issue of retroactivity should be addressed by the majority. While I express no opinion regarding the retroactive effect of the decision, I believe that the issue of retroactivity should be addressed in the interests of judicial economy.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.