evidence is relevant so long as it assists the jury in understanding the evidence
How later courts described this case
- evidence is relevant so long as it assists the jury in understanding the evidence
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*16 Judge WELLS
dissenting.
I cannot agree that the lending of defendant Toyota’s dealer tag to defendant Green was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. See Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hardin, 67 N.C. App. 487 , 313 S.E.2d 801 (1984). I also perceive that Eraemer v. Moore, discussed by the majority, supports my position. I therefore must respectfully dissent.