Opinion

Salazar v. State

70 O.B.A.J. 165
973 P.2d 315
1998 OK CR 70
1998 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 72
1998 WL 917039

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed: Dec 30, 1998
Status: Published
Author: Lane
On the bench: Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar, Lumpkin, Lane
Cited by: 18 cases
Authority: More cited than 5.9%

noting that despite Crawford, Perry, and Cheney, "[t]he Court's analysis and application of Poland in Salazar . . . represents this Court's current position on this issue"

How later courts described this case

noting that despite Crawford, Perry, and Cheney, "[t]he Court's analysis and application of Poland in Salazar . . . represents this Court's current position on this issue"
argument that "fitting end is the death penalty" not improper argument

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LANE, J.,

concurs in results.

¶ 1 I concur in results because of the treatment of victim impact evidence for the same reasons I stated in Ledbetter v. State, 933 P.2d 880, 902 (Okl.Cr.1997).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.