repeatedly invoking principle contrasted with Strickland here
How later courts described this case
- repeatedly invoking principle contrasted with Strickland here
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
LANE, Judge,
concurring in results:
I concur in results by reason of stare deci-sis on the issue of what can be raised on post-conviction relief. I maintain my position that if the material is not in the original record it can be raised on post-conviction by authority of 22 O.S.Supp.1995, § 1089 that I expressed in my special vote in Conover v. State, 942 P.2d 229 (Okl.Cr.1997).