Opinion

People v. Becker

  • 112 Cal. App. 2d 324
  • 246 P.2d 103
  • 1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1025
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
Jul 21, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Doran
On the bench
Drapeau, Doran
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

DORAN, J.—I concur.

The issue herein revolves around the meaning and application of the phrase “interested in any contract” as provided in section 1011 of the Education Code. That section reads, “No member of the governing board of any school district shall be interested in any contract made *328 by the board of which he is a member.” (Italics added.) The word interest has numerous meanings and applications but the obvious purpose contemplated by the section refers to an actual, specific and official interest as distinguished from a perfunctory or casual interest. Thus interpreted the provision is applicable, for the record reveals that those transporting the pupils must have liability insurance in companies approved by the board. It also appears from the record that in such insurance policies the school district is named as one of the beneficiaries, as well as the transportation company. This being so the appellant was “interested in a contract made by the board,” within the meaning and application of section 1011, as above quoted.

Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 14, 1952.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.