specific pro vision of law against discrimination denying school district the ability to appeal Board's decision controls over administrative procedure act
How later courts described this case
- specific pro vision of law against discrimination denying school district the ability to appeal Board's decision controls over administrative procedure act
- specific pro *577 vision of law against discrimination denying school district the ability to appeal Board's decision controls over administrative procedure act
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Hill, J.
(concurring specially) — The opinion correctly states the law. I concur specially because I do not believe that the legislature intended that school districts and other similarly situated “agencies” of the state should be without appeal from the rulings of the Washington State Board *274 Against Discrimination or any other state board. I am thoroughly in sympathy with the aims and purposes of the Board Against Discrimination, but its determinations should ultimately be subject to review by the courts. Ours is, or should be, a government of laws and not of men, even though the men, also, constitute a Board.
Rosellini, C. J., concurs with Hill, J.