Opinion

Kiser v. State

  • 782 P.2d 405
  • 1989 WL 132371
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Nov 22, 1989
Status
Published
Author
Parks
On the bench
Lane, Brett, Parks, Lumpkin, Johnson
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.0%

defendant affirmatively waived post-examination competency hearing by a jury when he withdrew motion for hearing and requested case proceed to preliminary hearing

How later courts described this case

  • defendant affirmatively waived post-examination competency hearing by a jury when he withdrew motion for hearing and requested case proceed to preliminary hearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PARKS, Presiding Justice,

specially concurring:

I write separately to address appellant’s fourth proposition of error wherein he claims that the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to grant a change of venue. Unlike Hale v. State, 750 P.2d 130 (Okl.Cr.1988), I cannot conclude that appellant has overcome the presumption of a fair and impartial trial due to the fact that he waived four of his peremptory challenges at trial. (Tr. 392, 491, 492). Therefore, I concur in the majority’s decision to affirm the judgment and sentence herein.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.